Steps Towards AI Governance — The Benefits of a Privacy-First Approach

In many organizations, privacy and security often feel like two separate fortresses, each with its own guards and battle plans. The larger the organization, the more likely this becomes. While the two teams do collaborate, each has its own view of the world, along with distinct priorities and approaches. Operating in lockstep is the ideal—sharing a common view and aligned priorities. Sounds like governance? There is certainly an element of that, and I firmly believe there’s a logical order to doing things, especially at scale.

A privacy-first approach isn’t just a good idea—it’s the only logical and effective way to safeguard our digital lives, both as individuals and as organizations. To make this point, I’ll be mixing my analogies a bit (bear with me), but let’s start by imagining I’ve come across a treasure chest. I want to secure it—yet I don’t know what’s inside, who it belongs to, or even how I came to have it. That’s often how data security efforts feel when they don’t begin with a clear understanding of data privacy.

I like to think of a modern organization as a bustling metropolis, with data flowing like water through pipes and buildings representing various systems and applications. Many companies operate like city planners trying to build a magnificent security wall around the entire city—without first consulting the master architect’s original blueprint. They invest heavily in guards, cameras, and reinforced gates, but they don’t truly understand the nature of the “treasures” within each building, or even which buildings house the most valuable assets. They’re securing everything with maximum effort, leading to wasted resources and overlooked vulnerabilities.

This is the pitfall of a security-only—or even security-first—approach. You might have the strongest locks, but if you don’t know what you’re locking away or where it truly needs protection, you’re essentially building a fortress around an empty field, while the real jewels are left unguarded in a shed.

A privacy-first approach, however, is like being the master architect who meticulously designs the city from the ground up.

1. Privacy: Knowing Your City’s Soul (Understanding the Data First)

Before a single brick of the security wall is laid, the master architect delves into the very essence of the city. This means understanding the data first. It’s a deep dive into the purpose of every building, every pathway—every single piece of information.

Think of it as creating a detailed city map. You’re not just drawing roads; you’re identifying:

• What kind of data exists: Is it personal information about citizens, sensitive financial records, or public park layouts?‍
• Where it resides: Which district, which building, which floor?‍
• How it’s being used: Is it for public services, commercial ventures, or internal operations?
  

This “master blueprint” isn’t just about what’s there—it’s about purpose and context. Why does the city even have this data? Who are the citizens it belongs to? What laws and agreements govern its use?

This fundamental understanding—this “why”—is the bedrock of privacy. Without it, you’re trying to secure a treasure chest in the dark, unaware if it contains gold, sand, or something entirely different. This initial understanding of data purpose and compliance is inherently a privacy-driven exercise, and it forms the very foundation of effective security.

2. Security: Building the Right Walls Around the Right Treasures

Once the master architect has a crystal-clear understanding (i.e., the “privacy posture”), then—and only then—does the real security work begin. Now the security team isn’t just building generic walls; they’re constructing targeted security based on precise knowledge.

What does this look like?

• Targeted Guard Placement: Instead of assigning guards randomly, you know exactly who has access to the sensitive data vaults and where those vaults are. You identify excessive permissions (e.g., a janitor having keys to the city’s treasury) and correct them. This is only possible when sensitive data has already been identified.‍
• Prioritizing High-Value Targets: You’re no longer reacting to every fire alarm. Instead, you focus your elite security forces on the most critical assets—those that, if compromised, would have the biggest impact on your citizens or the city’s reputation. This prioritization relies entirely on that initial, privacy-driven classification of sensitive data.
• Dynamic Access Control: Access isn’t static. It adapts based on the sensitivity of the data. Think of it like a smart city where certain doors open only for authorized personnel, and only when the data inside is appropriate for their access. This requires that data sensitivity (a privacy concern) has already been established.
  

This intelligent, privacy-informed security also leads to reduced scope and enhanced efficiency. If the blueprint shows that certain data is non-sensitive or only has a short lifespan, you don’t waste precious resources securing it with top-level protection. You allocate your security budget and personnel to the truly critical data—just like a smart city manager wouldn’t place armed guards around every public park bench.

Trying to apply maximum security to all data without understanding its privacy context is inefficient and costly. You wouldn’t do it for benches—so don’t do it to your data.

3. AI Governance: Utopia (for now)

As our digital cities grow and incorporate new technologies like artificial intelligence, the privacy-first approach becomes even more critical. Think of AI as a new, incredibly powerful urban planning tool. You need to understand not only what data it’s consuming (a privacy concern), but also how it’s processing that data, what decisions it’s making, and what biases might be baked into its algorithms.

At Relyance AI, this is what we call AI governance: ensuring that your AI systems are not only secure but also ethical and compliant. It’s about having visibility into the data journeys into and out of these powerful new tools and ensuring data is protected throughout its entire lifecycle.

Prioritizing privacy from the outset means building trustworthy and responsible AI systems from day one—rather than applying costly fixes later.

Relyance AI's approach to data privacy, data security, and AI governance is built on a unified platform that emphasizes visibility, context, and automation across the entire data lifecycle. Our offerings are designed to address the interconnected challenges of managing data in today’s complex, AI-driven environments.

‍Get in touch to learn more.